MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280644236 · doi:10.1525/nr.2022.25.4.121

Review: <i>Chinese Religions Going Global</i>, edited by Nanlai Cao, Guiseppe Giordan, Fenggang Yang

2022· article· en· W4280644236 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Naran Bilik

Bibliographic record

VenueNova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophySociologyReligious studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors in this fourteen-chapter volume explore Chinese religions on a worldwide stage. They write in a globalizing context against the background of a stronger and more demanding China, substantiated, for instance, by its “aggressive business outreach and mass emigration” (viii). First published as a volume from the Annual Review of the Sociology of Religion, the book exposes the nature of mixture and hybridity of Chinese religions, centering on the geopolitical landscape in the new era and the rise of new religions as one of its markers. The contributors from four different continents aim to challenge the usual dichotomized view of the western global and the Chinese local.Eight chapters examine cases of Chinese religion and Chinese religious communities in Europe, involving Italy, France, Britain, Germany, and Austria—a good balance against much of the literature on immigrant Chinese religion that has been based on research conducted largely in North America. Despite the fact that most new Chinese immigrants seem to be closed to the outside world, the authors of chapter 3, Fabio Berti and Valentina Pedone, point out that the Chinese Buddhist Puhuasi Temple in Prato engages with Italian society by making donations nationwide, in contrast with their Christian counterparts. Chapter 10, as well highlights Yiguandao as a unique form of Asian spirituality that appeals to non-Chinese practitioners.The remaining six chapters deal with overseas Chinese Christians in southeast Asia, Chinese Canadian evangelicals’ short-term missions to China, the global spread of Yiguandao, transnational Qigong networks, transnational Confucianism, and religious groups in Dubai, especially the Muslim diasporic community there. Recent restrictions on religion in China encourage Chinese house churches to redirect their resources overseas in a process known as “reverse missions.”The volume provides an excellent analysis of globalized Chinese religions that are shaped by multiple forms of interconnectedness and by a new geopolitical landscape, leading to “multiple sinicizations” (xi). The contributors have helped us to identify new situational trends and fertile ground for practical theorization. It would have been helpful if the editors had discussed the semantic and etymological differences between “religion,” as it is understood in the West, and zongjiao (宗教), its characterization in Chinese. This has been a focus for Western writers as early Hegel. For example, one might ask, “Is Qigong a religion or a folk practice? Or is it a mixture of both?” Of course, the same question could be asked about Confucianism. As a new area of study, however, it is understandable that the volume is mainly descriptive. More theoretical and comparative exploration will stand the contributors in good stead.Nevertheless, the book is a must-read for all those, professionals and nonprofessionals alike, who are interested in China and global Sinicization, especially in religions among immigrant Chinese communities overseas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent ReligionsSame topicReligious Tourism and SpacesFrench-language works237,207