MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280648737 · doi:10.3390/e24050709

Jaynes-Gibbs Entropic Convex Duals and Orthogonal Polynomials

2022· article· en· W4280648737 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Le Blanc

Bibliographic record

VenueEntropy · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStatistical Mechanics and Entropy
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsOrthogonal polynomialsDual polyhedronHermite polynomialsLaguerre polynomialsApplied mathematicsLegendre polynomialsPolynomialMathematical analysisPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The univariate noncentral distributions can be derived by multiplying their central distributions with translation factors. When constructed in terms of translated uniform distributions on unit radius hyperspheres, these translation factors become generating functions for classical families of orthogonal polynomials. The ultraspherical noncentral t, normal N, F, and χ2 distributions are thus found to be associated with the Gegenbauer, Hermite, Jacobi, and Laguerre polynomial families, respectively, with the corresponding central distributions standing for the polynomial family-defining weights. Obtained through an unconstrained minimization of the Gibbs potential, Jaynes’ maximal entropy priors are formally expressed in terms of the empirical densities’ entropic convex duals. Expanding these duals on orthogonal polynomial bases allows for the expedient determination of the Jaynes–Gibbs priors. Invoking the moment problem and the duality principle, modelization can be reduced to the direct determination of the prior moments in parametric space in terms of the Bayes factor’s orthogonal polynomial expansion coefficients in random variable space. Genomics and geophysics examples are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntropySame topicStatistical Mechanics and EntropyFrench-language works237,207