MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280649596 · doi:10.21037/tp-22-78

Risk factors of cerebral palsy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2022· review· en· W4280649596 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dandan Chen, Meiyuan Huang, Yangyan Yin, Dongmei Gui, Yuniao Gu, Taiping Zhuang, Caihua Chen, Kaiming Huo

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Pediatrics · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisCerebral palsyStudy heterogeneityPublication biasSubgroup analysisPediatricsMEDLINECohort studyPhysical therapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: This study aimed to explore the main risk factors for cerebral palsy in children by meta-analysis of the literature on the risk factors of cerebral palsy. Methods: We performed a literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and CENTRAL databases using the following search terms: ("cerebrl plsy" or "cerebrl plsis" or "infantile cerebral palsy") and ("risk factors"). Case-control or cohort studies of children with cerebral palsy and healthy children were included for meta-analysis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) of case-control studies was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The Chi-square test was used to test the heterogeneity of the literature. This study used subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis to identify sources of heterogeneity. If subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses could not identify the source of heterogeneity, no pooling between study results was performed, and only individual study results were described. In this study, Egger's test was used to test for publication bias. The random-effects model was used when heterogeneity existed, and the fixed-effect model was applied when heterogeneity did not exist. Results: A total of 1,836 related articles were retrieved. After screening, 13 articles were included in the analysis, involving a total of 2,489 children with cerebral palsy and 4,782 children without cerebral palsy. None of the included articles achieved a NOS score of 9, four articles scored 8, eight articles scored 7, and one article scored 6. Meta-analysis showed that maternal hypertension during pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes, premature delivery and emergency cesarean section were risk factors for cerebral palsy in children, and there was no heterogeneity among the literatures and no publication bias. Conclusions: This study identified gestational hypertension, preterm birth, premature rupture of membranes, and emergency cesarean section as risk factors for cerebral palsy in children through meta-analysis, providing a reference for risk monitoring and clinical intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranslational PediatricsSame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207