Furfurilactobacillus milii sp. nov., isolated from fermented cereal foods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genomic characterization of Furfurilactobacillus rossiae revealed that strains which were previously identified as F. rossiae are genetically heterogeneous. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains FUA3430, FUA3583, C5, FUA3115 and FUA3119, were 99.6 % identical to F. rossiae but the core genome analysis revealed that these strains share less than 93 % average nucleotide identity (ANI) with the F. rossiae type strain DSM 15814T. Because the ANI value is below the threshold for delineation of bacterial species, we propose the novel species Furfurilactobacillus milii sp. nov. with the type strain FUA3430T (=DSM 113338T=LMG 32478T). Strains of F. milii have smaller genomes than F. rossiae , lack the pdu-cbi-cob-hem cluster which is responsible for 1,2-propanediol utilization in F. rossiae , and lack genes involved in ethanolamine utilization. Two strains of the novel species (FUA3430T and FUA3583) were compared to F. rossiae FUA3214. Analysis of the cellular fatty acid composition and metabolite analysis did not reveal significant differences between F. milii sp. nov. and F. rossiae FUA3124. Although the growth requirements with respect to temperature and pH were very similar, only the strain of F. rossiae utilized melibiose and d-xylose. Morphological differences were also seen in the colony and cell size of the novel compared to F. rossiae .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".