MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4281289944 · doi:10.1101/2022.05.06.22274690

Phase I study of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine PTX-COVID19-B

2022· preprint· en· W4281289944 on OpenAlexafffund
Natalia Martin Orozco, Noah Vale, Alan Mihic, Talya Amor, Lawrence T. Reiter, Yuko Arita, Reuben Samson, Queenie Hu, Anne‐Claude Gingras, Brad Sorenson, Eric G. Marcusson, Piyush M. Patel

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New BrunswickManna ResearchCanada Research ChairsProvidence Health Care
FundersSunnybrook Research Institute
KeywordsImmunogenicityAdverse effectTolerabilityNeutralizing antibodyMedicinePlaceboVirologyTiterAntibodyImmunologyPharmacologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT PTX-COVID19-B mRNA vaccine encodes for SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein G614 variant and lacks the proline-proline (986-987 position) mutation present in other COVID-19 vaccines. This Phase 1 observer-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, ascending dose study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of two doses of PTX-COVID19-B vaccine in healthy seronegative adults. Participants received two intramuscular doses, 4 weeks apart, of 16-μg, 40-μg, or 100-μg PTX-COVID19-B. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate, self-resolving, and transient. The most common solicited local and systemic adverse event was pain at the injection site and headache, respectively. After the first immunization, all participants seroconverted, producing high titers of anti-receptor-binding-domain, anti-Spike, and neutralizing antibodies, including neutralizing antibodies against the ancestral viral strain and the Alpha, Beta, and Delta variants of concern, in a dose-dependent way, further increasing over 10-20 times after the second dose. All tested doses of PTX-COVID19-B were safe, well-tolerated, and provided a strong immunogenicity response. The 40-μg dose showed fewer adverse reactions than the 100-μg dose, supporting further investigation of the 40-μg dose. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04765436 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04765436 )

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research→French-language works237,207→