MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281382097 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.890094

Sex-Differences and Associations Between Complement Activation and Synovial Vascularization in Patients with Late-Stage Knee Osteoarthritis

2022· article· en· W4281382097 on OpenAlexafffund
Emily Sodhi, Holly T. Philpott, McKenzie M. Carter, Trevor B. Birmingham, C. Thomas Appleton

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchWestern UniversityCanada Research ChairsAcademic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario
KeywordsOsteoarthritisStage (stratigraphy)MedicineComplement systemPathologyImmunologyBiologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Synovial inflammation in knee osteoarthritis (OA) causes disorganized synovial angiogenesis and complement activation in synovial fluid, but links between complement and synovial microvascular pathology have not been established. Since complement causes vascular pathology in other diseases and since sex-differences exist in complement activation and in OA, we investigated sex differences in synovial fluid complement factors, synovial tissue vascular pathology, and associations between complement and synovial vascular pathology in patients with late-stage knee OA. Methods Patients with symptomatic, late-stage radiographic knee OA undergoing total knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy provided matched synovial fluid and tissue biopsies during surgery. Complement factors (C2, C5, adipsin, MBL, and CFI) and terminal complement complex (sC5b-C9) were measured in synovial fluid by multiplex or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Features of synovial vascular pathology (vascularization, perivascular edema, and vasculopathy) were assessed by histopathology. Multivariate linear regression models were used to assess associations between synovial fluid complement factors and histopathological features of vascular pathology, with adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and sex interaction. Sex-disaggregated comparisons were completed. Results Synovial fluid biomarker and histopathology data were included from 97 patients. Most synovial fluid complement factors and synovial tissue histopathological features were similar between sexes. Synovial fluid C5 trended to lower levels in males (-20.93 ng/mL [95%CI -42.08, 0.23] p= 0.05). Median vasculopathy scores (0.42 [95%CI 0.07, 0.77] p= 0.02) were higher in males. In the full cohort, C5 concentration was associated with lower vascularization scores (-0.005 [95%CI -0.010, -0.0001] p= 0.04) while accounting for sex*C5 interaction. In sex-disaggregated analyses, increased C5 concentration was associated with lower vascularization scores (-0.005 [95%CI –0.009, -0.0001] p= 0.04) in male patients, but not in female patients. Males had higher sC5b-C9 compared to females. Additionally, males with high C5 had a higher synovial fluid concentration of sC5b-C9 compared to males with low C5. No differences were found in females. Conclusion Higher synovial fluid C5 levels were associated with increased complement activation and decreased synovial vascularization in males but not in females with OA. Future studies should test whether synovial fluid complement activation suppresses synovial angiogenesis and identify mechanisms accounting for C5-related sex-differences in synovial fluid complement activation in patients with knee OA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in ImmunologySame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207