MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281392205 · doi:10.1061/9780784483893.112

Utilization of Low Pass Filters for the Calculation of Termination Points for 3D Fabrication Control of Pipe Spools

2022· article· en· W4281392205 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Mahdi Sharif, Steve Chuo, Abdullah Majeed, Minren Hung, Carl T. Haas

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing in Civil Engineering 2021 · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoint cloudScannerPipingComputer scienceModular programmingContext (archaeology)Noise (video)Modular designHough transformLaser scanningComputer visionPoint (geometry)Reverse engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsGeometryOpticsLaserMechanical engineeringImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of prefabrication and modularization, termination points are defined as local coordinate systems where assemblies are either connected or constrained. These points are typically points of connection between assemblies, sub-assemblies, or modules. As such, it is critical to ensure that termination points are measured accurately. In this study, the impact of point cloud filtering as a pre-processing step for improving the accuracy of detecting termination points in point clouds is investigated. An industrial-scale experiment was conducted where 3D scans of 40 piping components were collected and analysed while being fabricated. For data collection, each piping object was scanned using a laser scanner as well as a SLAM (simultaneous localization and mapping) scanner (80 point clouds were collected in total). The components vary in their design geometry. Using a guided Hough transform, a circle fitting method was developed to find the termination points in the scanned point clouds. It was then shown that applying noise removal as a pre-processing step for the termination point calculation can substantially improve the accuracy irrespective of the source of acquisition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputing in Civil Engineering 2021Same topic3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207