Midwife’s interventions to promote positive experiences for female homosexual couples during pregnancy: A scoping review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The emergence of new meanings of the term family and the current connection to heteronormativity mean there should be an investment on the acknowledgement of the LGBT community's needs, with the goal of reaching equality. This article aims to analyze the experience of female homosexual couples overseeing pregnancy, identify the interventions carried out by obstetric nurses, which facilitate the above couples’ transition to parenthood, and identify the difficulties experienced by pregnant women.Methods: Research was carried out by MeSH 2021 Headings, via the following databases Bireme, MEDLINE Complete, PubMed and CINAHL Complete. 352 results were identified, and based on the inclusive and exclusive criteria outlined, five articles were included. When in contact with healthcare professionals, female homosexuals experience heterosexism, meaning homophobia and the expectation of heterosexuality, a lack of support and education, which exacerbates these women's stress levels whilst transitioning to parenthood; this transition will be addressed according to the Transitions Theory of Afaf Meleis.Results: The LGBT community is an important component in the life of a pregnant woman. Healthcare professionals should invest in educating themselves with the objective of evaluating what is required on a social level, reproductive health and the family construct in a way which enhances the therapeutic relationship, also taking into account that the impact of sexual orientation on pregnancy outcomes is unclear.Conclusions: According to the research found, it is crucial that nurses and particularly obstetric nurses improve their communication skills and attitudes, so as to promote a better relationship with these women. It is important that multidisciplinary teams provide continuous education on this topic in order to provide holistic care, free from discrimination or heterosexism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.044 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".