Ultra‐Early Functional Improvement After Stroke Thrombectomy – Predictors and Implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Neurocritical care is routinely provided to patients post‐endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for anterior large vessel occlusion strokes. We aim to study the relationship between immediate improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on outcomes post‐EVT and potential implications for postprocedural care. Methods We performed a retrospective review of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (internal carotid/proximal middle cerebral artery) patients undergoing EVT. Demographic, clinical, and imaging information was analyzed. Ultra‐early functional improvement (UEFI) was defined as NIHSS score <6 within 30 minutes of successful recanalization. We analyzed the incidence and predictors of UEFI, and explored reasons for neurological decline post‐UEFI. Results Of the 343 anterior large vessel occlusion patients undergoing EVT, mean age was 71 ± 15 and 46% were male. Mean NIHSS was 17 ± 6 and Time Last Known Well (TLKW) to arrival was 9 ± 11 hours. UEFI was observed in 23% (79/343) of patients. Independent predictors of UEFI included lower pretreatment NIHSS, favorable Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), and lower admission systolic blood pressure. Rates of 90‐day‐modified Rankin scale 0–2 were higher (71% versus 33%, P <0.01) and the rate of mortality (8% versus 28%, P <0.01) was lower in the UEFI group compared with the non‐UEFI group. Amongst patients with UEFI, 1.3% (1/79) experienced increase in NIHSS by ≥4 points within 24 hours of EVT. This patient received thrombolysis, achieved TICI‐2B recanalization, and follow‐up neuroimaging revealed a parenchymal hemorrhage and an infarct volume of 44 mL. None of the patients with UEFI required continuous antihypertensive infusions. Conclusions Approximately 1‐in‐4 of anterior large vessel occlusion stroke patients undergoing EVT have an NIHSS score of <6 within 30 minutes of successful recanalization. Only 1% of them experience significant decline in neurological status within 24 hours of the procedure with the majority achieving functional independence at 90 days. The need for advanced neurocritical care should be reevaluated in these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".