MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281482940 · doi:10.1111/aogs.14378

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and breastfeeding practices: A secondary analysis of data from the All Our Families Cohort

2022· article· en· W4281482940 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kristin Horsley, Kathleen H. Chaput, Deborah Da Costa, Tuong‐Vi Nguyen, Natalie Dayan, Lianne Tomfohr‐Madsen, Suzanne Tough

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMcGill University
FundersAlberta Children's Hospital FoundationAlberta InnovatesAlberta Innovates - Health Solutions
KeywordsMedicineBreastfeedingPregnancyCohortObstetricsCohort studyFamily medicinePediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy occur in approximately 7%-10% of pregnancies and are associated with adverse maternal cardiovascular health outcomes across the lifespan. In contrast, breastfeeding has been associated with a reduction in cardiovascular risk factors in a dose-dependent manner. Despite the potential protective effects of lactation on cardiovascular risk, how hypertensive disorders of pregnancy relate to breastfeeding practices and experiences is not well understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and breastfeeding outcomes in the first year postpartum. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of prospective data from the All Our Families Cohort, a population-based study conducted in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Women with a singleton pregnancy (n = 1418) who completed self-report questionnaires at <25 weeks and 34-36 weeks of gestation, and 4 months and 12 months postpartum, and provided consent to link to electronic medical records that identified diagnoses of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (n = 122). Logistic and multiple linear regression analyses were used to model associations between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and breastfeeding outcomes. Outcomes included breastfeeding intention, intended duration, exclusive breastfeeding at 4 months, breastfeeding duration at 12 months and breastfeeding difficulties. RESULTS: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were not associated with breastfeeding intention (odds ration [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-3.03, P = 0.57), intended breastfeeding duration (b = -3.28, 95% CI -7.04 to 0.48, P = 0.09), or initiation (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.29- 1.65, P = 0.32), but were associated with an increase in the odds of non-exclusive breastfeeding at 4 months postpartum (OR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.39-3.22, P < 0.001). Women with hypertensive disorders breastfed for 6.26 (95% CI -10.00 to -2.51, P < 0.001) weeks less over 12 months postpartum, had significantly higher odds of reporting insufficient milk supply (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.19-2.46, P < 0.05) and had lower odds of breast and/or nipple pain (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.92, P < 0.05) compared with those without hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with altered breastfeeding practices and experiences during the first year postpartum. Further research is needed to examine biopsychosocial mechanisms through which hypertensive disorders associate with shorter breastfeeding duration, and to examine whether greater breastfeeding duration, intensity or exclusivity reduces short- or long-term maternal cardiovascular risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Obstetricia Et Gynecologica ScandinavicaSame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207