Sex differences in the nasal microbiome of healthy young adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Respiratory diseases impose an immense health burden worldwide. Epidemiological studies have revealed extensive disparities in the incidence and severity of respiratory tract infections (RTIs) between males and females . It is recently hypothesized that there might also be a nasal microbiome axis contributing to the observed sex disparities, but without evidence. In this work, we study the nasal microbiome of healthy young adults in, as of today, the largest cohort based on deep shot-gun metagenomic sequencing. We mainly focus on the bacteriome, but also integrate the mycobiome to get a more holistic perspective. De novo assembly is performed to catalog the nasal bacterial colonizers/residents, which also identify and therefore account for uncharacterized components of the community. The bacteriome is then profiled based on the non-redundant metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) catalog constructed therefrom. Unsupervised clustering reveals clearly separable structural patterns in the nasal microbiome between the two sexes. Following this link, we systematically evaluate sex differences for the first time and reveal extensive sex-specific features in the nasal microbiome composition. More importantly, through network analyses, we capture markedly higher ecological stability and antagonistic potentials in the nasal microbiome of females than that of males. The analysis of the keystone bacteria of the communities reveal that the sex-dependent evolutionary characteristics might have contributed to this difference . Highlights The non-redundant nasal bacterial MAGs catalog constructed from ultra-deeply sequenced metagenomic data provides a valuable resource. Integrating nasal bacteriome and mycobiome data provides a more holistic perspective for the understudied human nasal microbiome. Unsupervised clustering helps uncover extensive sex differences in the nasal microbiome compositions. Network analyses capture markedly higher ecological stability and antagonistic potentials in the nasal microbiome of females than that of males. Sex-dependent genetic evolutionary forces play a role in the shaping of keystones in the nasal microbial community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".