Le musée de société aujourd’hui. Héritage et mutation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Né en France il y a plus de trente ans, le concept de musée de société a évolué et s’est pensé et mis en œuvre de maintes manières. Complexe, mouvante et polymorphe, cette notion s’est transformée selon les contextes, les auteurs ou encore les administrations en charge des musées définis sous cette appellation. Plus que d’en proposer une définition fixe, ce dossier vise à rendre compte du caractère souple de la notion de musée de société en esquissant les contours théoriques et pratiques à partir de ses différents usages en France, en Espagne, en Italie, au Québec et au Brésil. Alors qu’il est majoritairement perçu comme un concept francophone, cette mise en perspective illustre le fait qu’il englobe plutôt des tendances de fond des musées. De par cette perspective internationale, ce dossier souhaite ainsi ouvrir de nouvelles pistes de réflexion sur les musées de société, à la fois sur ce que nous englobons dans cette typologie, mais aussi plus largement sur les usages, les contacts, les emprunts ainsi que les significations croisées des concepts muséologiques à l’échelle internationale. With its origins in France dating back to over thirty years ago, the concept of the museum of society has evolved, been thought of and implemented in a variety of ways. This notion, being complex, shifting and polymorphous, has been transformed according to the different contexts, originators and administrators in charge of museums that fall into this category. Rather than propose a single definition of this concept, this issue aims to highlight the versatility of the notion of museums of society by giving an idea of its theoretical and practical applications in different examples in France, Spain, Italy, Quebec and Brazil. While it is predominately seen as a francophone concept, putting this notion into perspective in this way demonstrates the fact that it is encompasses an underlying trend in museums. Thanks to this international approach, this issue aims to offer up new lines of inquiry concerning museums of society, what is encompassed by this category, as well as concerning uses, connections, derivations and crossed significations of museological concepts on an international scale. El concepto de museo de sociedad, nacido en Francia hace más de treinta años, ha evolucionado y se ha pensado y desarrollado de muy diversas maneras. Compleja, cambiante y polimorfa, esta noción se ha transformado según los contextos, los autores o las administraciones responsables de los museos definidos bajo esta denominación. Con este dossier, en lugar de proponer una definición fija, se pretende mostrar el carácter flexible de la noción de museo de sociedad esbozando sus contornos teóricos y prácticos a partir de sus diferentes usos en Francia, España, Italia, Quebec y Brasil. Aunque se percibe sobre todo como un concepto francófono, esta perspectiva ilustra el hecho de que más bien engloba tendencias fundamentales en los museos. Desde su perspectiva internacional, el presente dossier pretende abrir nuevas vías de reflexión sobre el museo de sociedad, tanto sobre lo que abarcamos en esta tipología, como también, de forma más amplia, sobre los usos, contactos, préstamos y significados transversales de los conceptos museológicos a escala internacional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".