MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Investigating the effects of Ceylon cinnamon water extract on HepG2 cells for type 2 diabetes therapy Corresponding author: Lidan You. Professor at the University of Toronto in the Department of Mechanical Engineering & Institute of Biomedical Engineering

2022· preprint· en· W4281554819 on OpenAlexaffabout
Leila Azimian, Suzie Song, Chun‐Yu Lin, Nimalka Weerasuriya, Ranjani Munasinghe, Lidan You

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNatural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetforminType 2 diabetesMedicineViability assayInsulin resistanceDiabetes mellitusCellType 2 Diabetes MellitusPharmacologyCarbohydrate metabolismGene expressionGeneEndocrinologyChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cinnamon and its extracts have been used herbal remedies including reducing insulin resistance and diabetic complications. T2DM is a rapidly growing health concern around the world[[1]](#ref-0001). While many drugs are now available for T2DM treatment, side effects and costs can be considerable, and there is increasing interest in natural products for managing chronic health conditions[2]. Cinnamon may decrease the expression of genes associated with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of cinnamon water extract (CWE) and metformin on T2DM-related gene expression. The HepG2 human hepatoma cell line is widely used in drug metabolism and hepatotoxicity studies. HepG2 cells were treated with different concentrations of metformin or CWE for 24 or 48 h. Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay, and glucose uptake was compared between untreated and CWE- or metformin-treated cells under high-glucose conditions. Finally, total RNA was extracted and analyzed by RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq), and bioinformatics analysis was performed to compare the transcriptional effects of CWE and metformin. We found that cell viability was higher in cells treated with CWE than in metformin-treated cells, demonstrating that the cinnamon extract was not toxic at the tested doses. CWE significantly increased glucose uptake in HepG2 cells to the same degree as metformin (1.4-fold). RNA-Seq data revealed that CWE and metformin both induced significant changes (1.3- to 1.4-fold increases) in glucose uptake gene expression compared with untreated controls, but that transcriptional differences between CWE and metformin conditions were not significant. The effects of 0.125 mg mL CWE on gene expression were comparable to those seen with 1.5 mg mL (9.5 mM) metformin. We found that gene expression at 0.125 mg mL-1 CWE was comparable to 1.5 mg mL-1 (9.5 mM) metformin. Our results reveal that CWE’s effects on cell viability, glucose uptake, and gene expression in HepG2 cells are comparable to those of the widely used antidiabetic drug metformin, suggesting that CWE may be an effective dietary supplement for mitigating T2DM-related metabolic dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNatural Antidiabetic Agents StudiesFrench-language works237,207