MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4281559143 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1638330/v1

Susceptibility of Anopheles Mosquitoes to Insecticides Used In Busia and Tororo Districts, Eastern Uganda

2022· preprint· en· W4281559143 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Faith Chemutai, Joseph Kisakye, Fredrick Kabbale, Anthony Egeru

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsPermethrinAnophelesBiologyToxicologyAnopheles gambiaeLarvaVeterinary medicineDeltamethrinPesticideMalariaEcologyMedicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study assessed the susceptibility of Anopheles mosquitoes to LLINs and IRS as vector control interventions used in Tororo and Busia district. Samples of Anopheles mosquito larvae were collected from various breeding grounds and reared in an insectary. Emerged adults were dissected under a stereoscopic microscope and identified using standardized morphological keys after respective bioassays on used LLINs and sprayed walls. A One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to test for significant differences in the mean composition of mosquito species across the study area, mean variations, mortalities by net and wall type. Results showed that the Anopheles gambiae sensu lato revealed a higher mean of 78.33 ± 41.52, compared to Anopheles funestus (16.42 ± 24.87) which was lonely found in Busia district. Out of four brands of nets tested for insecticides susceptibility, 99% mortality was recorded for the insecticide concentration of 80 mg/m2 deltamethrin impregnated DAWA plus 2.0 nets. PermaNet 3.0 and Olyset recorded mortality rate of 95% and 93% at chemical concentrations of 50 mg/m2 and 525 mg/m2 permethrin respectively. PermaNet 2.0 recorded 67% mortality at 55 mg/m2 permethrin. The average number of Anopheles mosquitoes were more susceptible to 12.5 mg/m2 of Fludora fusion impregnated onto plastered painted walls at a rate of 100% as compared to the other types of walls after 2 weeks (6.86 ± 4.07) and 1 month of chemical spray (6.69 ± 4.01) varied insignificantly (t = 0.175, P = 0.861). Meanwhile, a disaggregated results by time of spray (T0 and T1) and exposure periods, showed that plastered painted wall, had higher mortalities followed by Brick Plain and Mud/Wattle wall substrates, respectively. This study has shown that vector behavior, biology and physiology need consistent monitoring and surveillance for further entomological characterization and the need for coming up with new vector control interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicMosquito-borne diseases and control→French-language works237,207→