Progression patterns by types of metastatic spread, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and clinical symptoms: Post-hoc analyses of ARAMIS.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
5044 Background: Darolutamide (DARO), a highly potent and structurally distinct androgen receptor inhibitor, prolonged metastasis-free survival by nearly 2 years and reduced the risk of death by 31% vs placebo (PBO) with a favorable tolerability profile in patients (pts) with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in ARAMIS. We present post-hoc analyses of ARAMIS to evaluate the association between metastatic progression with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and clinical progression and to describe the distribution of metastatic progression between groups. Methods: Pts with nmCRPC were randomized 2:1 to DARO (n=955) or PBO (n=554) while continuing androgen-deprivation therapy. Descriptive analyses were performed using the primary data cutoff (Sept 3, 2018) for the double-blind period. Post-baseline metastases were based on central review of conventional radiographic imaging every 16 weeks. PSA and pain progression were defined per primary analysis ( N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1235-46). Results: Metastatic progression was observed in 13.6% of DARO and 28.5% of PBO pts. Most pts had isolated progression as bone (DARO 46%, PBO 39%) or lymph node (32%; 40%) metastasis (Table). Pts with radiographic progression had shorter median time from initial diagnosis to study treatment (DARO 72.9, PBO 74.4 months) vs the overall ARAMIS population (86.2, 84.2 months). Of all pts with metastatic progression, baseline PSA levels (ng/mL) were similar in DARO (12.6) and PBO pts (15.1); DARO pts had lower median PSA before metastasis (16.7) vs PBO pts (48.0) and median absolute/relative PSA decrease from baseline of -0.7/-3.2% vs an increase for PBO pts of 29.5/181%. PSA progression before metastasis was observed in 55.6% (160/288) of pts, occurring in fewer DARO (45.4%) vs PBO pts (63.9%) (treatment difference 18.5%; nominal 95% CI 6.5%–30.6%). The median time between PSA progression and metastasis was 7.0 months with DARO vs 5.6 months with PBO. Pain progression before metastatic progression was rare and similar between groups (DARO 16.9%, PBO 17.7%). Conclusions: DARO significantly reduced risk of metastatic progression and improved overall survival vs PBO without changing the pattern of metastatic progression. Many pts with nmCRPC experienced metastatic progression without PSA progression, and pain progression was rare. These results support the use of imaging with PSA monitoring to properly identify disease progression in pts with nmCRPC. Clinical trial information: TBC. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".