Quantitation of a Urinary Profile of Biomarkers in Gaucher Disease Type 1 Patients Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gaucher disease is a rare inherited disorder caused by a deficiency of the lysosomal acid beta-glucocerebrosidase enzyme. Metabolomic studies by our group targeted several new potential urinary biomarkers. Apart from lyso-Gb1, these studies highlighted lyso-Gb1 analogs −28, −26, −12 (A/B), +2, +14, +16 (A/B), +30, and +32 Da, and polycyclic lyso-Gb1 analogs 362, 366, 390, and 394 Da. The main objective of the current study was to develop and validate a robust UPLC-MS/MS method to study the urine distribution of these biomarkers in patients. Method: Urine samples were purified using solid-phase extraction. A 12 min UPLC-MS/MS method was developed. Results: Validation assays revealed high precision and accuracy for creatinine and lyso-Gb1. Most lyso-Gb1 analogs had good recovery rates and high intra- and interday precision assays. Biomarker-estimated LOD and LOQ levels ranged from 56–109 pM to 186–354 pM, respectively. Comparison between GD patients and healthy controls showed significant differences in most biomarker levels. Typically, treated GD patients presented lower biomarker levels compared to untreated patients. Conclusions: These data suggest that the metabolites investigated might be interesting GD biomarkers. More studies with a larger cohort of patients will be needed to better understand the clinical significance of these GD biomarkers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".