Comparison of Total Ionizing Dose Effects in 22-nm and 28-nm FD SOI Technologies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Total ionizing dose (TID) effects from Co-60 gamma ray and heavy ion irradiation were studied at the 22-nm FD SOI technology node and compared with the testing results from the 28-nm FD SOI technology. Ring oscillators (RO) designed with inverters, NAND2, and NOR2 gates were used to observe the output frequency drift and current draw. Experimental results show a noticeable increased device current draw and decreases in RO frequencies where NOR2 ROs have the most degradation. As well, the functionality of a 256 kb SRAM block and shift-register chains were evaluated during C0-60 irradiation. SRAM functionality deteriorated at 325 krad(Si) of the total dosage, while the FF chains remained functional up to 1 Mrad(Si). Overall, the 22-nm FD SOI results show better resilience to TID effects compared to the 28-nm FD SOI technology node.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".