MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281646460 · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2022-abn.22

Quantitative volumetric analysis of piriform cortex on MRI and its clinical correla- tion in drug-refractory TLE

2022· article· en· W4281646460 on OpenAlexaff
Sabahat Iqbal, Jose Rojas-Leon, Marian Galovic, Sjoerd B. Vos, Alexander Hammers, Jane de Tisi, Mathias J Koepp, John S. Duncan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPiriform cortexTemporal lobeEpileptogenesisAtrophyEpilepsyHippocampusHippocampal formationMedicineHippocampal sclerosisPsychologyNuclear medicineInternal medicineNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction In animal studies, an area known as the piriform cortex (PC) has been implicated to be a critical area of epileptogenesis. However, this has seen limited translation to human studies. Objective To understand the degree of damage to PC in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) as well as to correlate clinical characteristics of TLE with PC volumetry. Methods Manual segmentation of the PC on structural MR images of 60 consecutive adults with drug- refractory unilateral TLE and 20 age matched control subjects was performed. Univariate and multivari- ate regression models were employed to examine the relationship of PC and hippocampal volumes with clinical variables collected. Results In controls, consistent asymmetry between the left and right PC was found. The right PC was consistently larger than the left across all study groups. Notably, the inter-rater and intra-rater variability were in good agreement. This study found that both the ipsilateral (r=-0.291, p=0.012) and contralateral (r=-0.338, p= 0.008) PC volumes have a negative correlation with the duration of epilepsy. Therefore, evidencing the damage of PC in mesial TLE. The temporal atrophy of the PC correlated with temporal atrophy of the hippocampus. This study could not strongly establish the correlation between any other clinical variable studied. Conclusion Further longitudinal studies are required to confirm the findings of this study to enable the PC to be considered in treatment strategies for patients with drug-refractory TLE. siqbal2482@gmail.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatrySame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207