MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281666254 · doi:10.1139/as-2021-0048

Surface temperature inversion characteristics in dissimilar valleys, Yukon Canada

2022· article· en· W4281666254 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Nick C. Noad, Philip P. Bonnaventure

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Lethbridge
KeywordsPermafrostTransectAir temperatureSurface air temperatureInversion (geology)LatitudeGeologyPhysical geographyRange (aeronautics)ClimatologyEnvironmental scienceClimate changeGeomorphologyGeographyOceanographyGeodesy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permafrost distribution in high-latitude continental mountains is a product of both latitudinal and elevationally controlled attributes. Frequently occurring surface-based temperature inversions (SBIs) significantly modify surface lapse rates (SLRs) annually. We aim to identify and quantify patterns of SBI characteristics in two proximal yet morphologically and vegetatively dissimilar central Yukon valleys. Elevational transect analysis is applied by using sensors in valley bottoms and 100 m upslope to determine in situ SLRs for the study period (August 2017 – August 2021). SLRs were shown to vary significantly between these dissimilar valleys. Climate reanalysis products (ClimateNA and Globsim) underestimated or almost entirely missed the presence of strong SBIs which produce annual average SLRs that range from 0.46 to 1.2 °C 100 m −1 . The magnitude of these hyper-inversions was grossly underpredicted by previous surface air temperature modelling that attempted to account for SBIs across Yukon. Our results support the previously conceptualized framework that strong SBIs influence surface air temperatures and the pattern of permafrost distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArctic ScienceSame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207