MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281679465 · doi:10.1136/emermed-2022-rcem.32

775 Assessment of headache in the emergency department to rule out subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy

2022· review· en· W4281679465 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ros Wade, Matthew Walton, Melissa Harden, Robert Hodgson, Alison Eastwood, James Storey, Taj Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueEmergency Medicine Journal · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLumbar punctureEmergency departmentMeta-analysisNeuroradiologyDiagnostic accuracyRadiologySubarachnoid haemorrhageLumbarSubarachnoid hemorrhageMEDLINEEmergency medicineNeurologySurgeryInternal medicineCerebrospinal fluid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims/Objectives/Background Acute headache accounts for around 2% of Emergency Department attendances. Headache guidelines recommend non-contrast head computed tomography (CT) followed by lumbar puncture to exclude subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Advances in imaging technology have led emergency physicians to question the necessity of routine lumbar puncture after negative CT. This systematic review assessed diagnostic strategies for neurologically intact headache patients. Methods/Design In February 2020, 18 electronic databases (including MEDLINE and Embase) were searched for studies of any clinical decision rule or diagnostic test for assessing neurologically intact severe headache patients, reaching maximum intensity within an hour. Studies were quality assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Diagnostic accuracy data were extracted into 2x2 tables to calculate sensitivity, specificity, false-positive and false-negative rates. Where appropriate, hierarchical bivariate meta-analysis was used to synthesise results. Results/Conclusions Thirty-seven studies were included. Eight studies assessing the accuracy of the Ottawa SAH clinical decision rule were pooled; sensitivity was 99.5%, specificity was 23.7%. Four studies (with neuroradiology expertise) assessing CT within six hours of headache onset were pooled; sensitivity was 98.7%, specificity was 100%. CT sensitivity beyond six hours was considerably lower (≤90%; 2 studies). Three studies assessing lumbar puncture (spectrophotometric analysis) following negative CT were pooled; sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 95.2%. LP-related adverse events were reported in 5.3–9.5% patients (2 studies). The evidence suggests that the Ottawa Rule has limited value for ruling out SAH; the high false positive rate means that its use would potentially result in 76% SAH-negative patients undergoing further investigation with no additional benefit. Modern CT within six hours of headache onset (with images assessed by a neuroradiologist) is highly accurate and likely to be sufficient to rule out SAH. However, sensitivity reduces considerably over time. The CT-LP pathway remains a highly sensitive pathway for detecting SAH, although LP resulted in some false-positives and adverse events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmergency Medicine JournalSame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207