MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281685765 · doi:10.4000/ries.11853

La santé à l'école

2022· paratext· fr· W4281685765 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale d éducation de Sèvres · 2022
Typeparatext
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

D’une conception traditionnelle fondée sur l’hygiène et la prévention des maladies à la prise en compte du bien-être global des enfants, la définition de la santé à l’école a beaucoup évolué au fil des deux derniers siècles, sous l’influence des grandes organisations internationales. Si nombre de recherches portent sur ce sujet, force est de constater que peu d’études examinent les relations établies entre les familles, l’école et les professionnels de santé. Ces trois acteurs également concernés partagent-ils les mêmes objectifs et les mêmes attentes ? Comment s’articulent les normes scolaires et les normes de santé ? Qui possède l’expertise et le pouvoir d’agir ? Le 89e dossier de la Revue internationale d’éducation de Sèvres s’intéresse aussi bien aux représentations et aux pratiques de chacun qu’aux effets des dispositifs mis en place, dans des pays aux contextes socioculturels et politiques variés. Même si les études de cas font ressortir une grande diversité de réponses et de situations, il est intéressant de souligner des éléments de convergence tels que l’approche des besoins spécifiques des enfants, l’attention portée aux troubles scolaires, la question de la prévention, ou encore la recherche du bien-être des élèves. L’équilibre entre les acteurs reste toutefois fragile et le sujet ne demande qu’à être davantage exploré. Études de cas : Allemagne, Belgique, Cameroun, Chine, Pays-Bas, Pologne, comparaison Québec-Flandre, Tunisie, Turquie. The scope of health in schools has changed significantly over the last two centuries under the influence of major international organisations: from a traditional focus on hygiene and disease prevention it has evolved to encompass children's overall wellbeing. While there is much research on this subject, few studies examine the relationships between families, schools and health professionals. While all three play a part in health education, do they share the same objectives and expectations? How do school and health standards relate to each other? Who has the expertise and the power to act? The 89th issue of the Revue internationale d'éducation de Sèvres focuses on the representations and practices of each of these actors as well as on the effects of the measures taken in ten countries with different socio-cultural and political contexts. Even if the case studies reveal a great diversity of responses and situations, it is worth highlighting elements of convergence such as a focus on the individual needs of the child, on special education needs, preventative interventions and pupils’ wellbeing. However, the balance between actors remains fragile and the topic requires further investigation. Case studies: Belgium, Cameroon, China, Germany, Netherlands, Poland, Quebec-Flanders comparison, Tunisia, Turkey. La definición de la salud en las escuelas ha conocido una notable evolución en los últimos dos siglos bajo la influencia de las grandes organizaciones internacionales, desde las concepciones tradicionales decimonónicas fundadas en la higiene y la prevención de las enfermedades hasta la consideración actual del bienestar global de los niños. Si no faltan las investigaciones sobre este particular, cabe constatar que son pocos los estudios que examinan las relaciones establecidas entre las familias, la escuela y los profesionales de la salud. ¿Comparten estos tres actores igualmente participantes del proceso los mismos objetivos y las mismas expectativas? ¿Cómo se articulan las normas escolares y las normas sanitarias? ¿Quién posee la pericia y el poder de actuar? El número 89 de la Revue internationale d’éducation de Sèvres se interesa tanto por las representaciones y las prácticas de cada uno como por los efectos de los dispositivos desarrollados en unos diez países con contextos socioculturales y políticos variados. Aunque se desprendan de los estudios de caso una gran diversidad de respuestas y de situaciones, es interesante subrayar la existencia de unos elementos de convergencia tales y como la aproximación de las necesidades específicas de los niños, la atención otorgada a los problemas escolares, el tema de la prevención o también la búsqueda del bienestar para los alumnos. Sin embargo, el equilibrio entre los actores sigue siendo frágil y el tema requiere más exploraciones. Estudios de caso: Alemania, Bélgica, Camerún, China, Países Bajos, Polonia, comparación Quebec-Flandes, Túnez y Turquía.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.023
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale d éducation de SèvresSame topicSchool Health and Nursing EducationFrench-language works237,207