Exposure of embryonating eggs to Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli potentiates E. coli pathogenicity and increases mortality of neonatal chickens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enterococci and Escherichia coli are opportunistic pathogens of poultry and are associated with embryo and neonatal chick mortality. We have recently demonstrated that 56% of dead broiler chicken embryos in commercial hatcheries in western Canada were due to the coinfection of Enterococcus species and E. coli. The objective of this study was to investigate the host-pathogen interactions of Enterococcus faecalis and E. coli in developing chicken embryos. Embryonating eggs at 12 d of incubation were dipped in a solution of E. faecalis and/or E. coli for 30 s to expose the eggshell to study the migration and colonization of E. faecalis and E. coli in the internal organs of chicken embryos and subsequent neonatal chicken mortality following hatch. A multidrug-resistant E. faecalis isolate from a dead chicken embryo and an E. faecalis isolate from a case of yolk sac infection were able to colonize the internal organs of chicken embryos rapidly compared to an E. faecalis isolate from a healthy chicken without affecting viability or hatchability of embryos. Although E. faecalis colonized internal organs of chicken embryos, no evidence of inflammation of these organs nor the expression of virulence genes of E. faecalis was observed. Although E. faecalis and E. coli alone did not affect the viability of embryos, a significantly high neonatal chicken mortality (27%) was observed following exposure of embryos to both E. faecalis and E. coli. Upregulation of IL-1 and CXCR4 was evident 48 h before peak mortality of neonatal chickens; this could suggest a possible link of cytokine dysregulation to increased mortality in coinfected neonatal chickens. However, further studies are warranted to investigate this issue vis-à-vis coinfection with E. faecalis and E. coli in chicken embryos and neonatal chickens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".