MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281699930 · doi:10.1155/2022/7213841

Driver Fatigue Detection Method Based on Human Pose Information Entropy

2022· article· en· W4281699930 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Taiguo Li, Tiance Zhang, Yingzhi Zhang, Liben Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Program of Gansu ProvinceYouth Science Foundation of Lanzhou Jiaotong UniversityLanzhou Jiaotong University
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceSupport vector machineComputer scienceEntropy (arrow of time)Facial expressionRobustness (evolution)Computer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Feature extraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Driver fatigue detection (DFD) is an effective method to prevent traffic accidents. The existing research on DFD using facial features is an effective and noninvasive fatigue detection method. However, this approach is affected by facial occlusions (glasses, sunglasses, masks, etc.) and the large facial pose deformations in the extraction of effective fatigue features. In this paper, we introduce a novel DFD method using human pose information entropy. The method first estimates human pose from video sequences and then uses them as clues to extract multiple fatigue-related features which can reduce the influence of facial occlusion and head pose deformation. Information entropy and sliding window algorithm are applied to analyse and calculate sufficient consecutive video frames to obtain more robust and accurate fatigue-related values than by using a single frame. These information entropy values are combined resorting to the support vector machine (SVM) to recognize the driver fatigue state. Experimental results show that the method can achieve much higher accuracy and robustness, and the detection speed meets the requirements of real time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicSleep and Work-Related FatigueFrench-language works237,207