MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281720319 · doi:10.1177/09576509221100150

Flutter of a finite rectangular Wing’D mill in pitch and heave

2022· article· en· W4281720319 on OpenAlexaff
S. P. Farthing

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A Journal of Power and Energy · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsRemotely Operated Platform for Ocean Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlutterTrailing edgePhysicsMechanicsChord (peer-to-peer)AirfoilAngle of attackLeading edgeLift (data mining)MathematicsAcousticsAerodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exact solutions of flutter are explored for a mode suitable for an oscillating 2D hydrofoil version of the summarised FlutterWing windpump which radically surpasses the old rotary fanpump. The imaginary part G of the 1D Theodorsen wake lift factor T rises singularly from the steady to allow 1D pure pitch flutter around the leading edge at low frequency. But its logarithmic infinite negative pitch damping by the shed vorticity is capped by the log of the 2D span. The downwash of an oscillating trailing (tip) vortex is reduced by a function of the reduced frequency based on spanwise distance. Its lag damps pitch and further raises the pitch unstable aspect ratio A to above 36. All binary pitch & heave neutral flutter frequency contours in (inertia, imbalance) space still pass through a nexus of the same total pitch inertia and imbalance as the corrected virtual mass concentrated at ¾ chord, a very high total in water. The internal bound windwise vortex from ¼ chord to trailing edge reduces as A −2 the 1D lift slope at all frequencies. It expands the 1D T = ½ double root of high frequency elliptical contours kissing the low frequency limit line at the nexus to make them dip below the line to the right of the nexus as hyperbolae with the nexal ray as left asymptote. Thus low A discovers a new wedge of high frequency binary flutter with real mass moments less than the virtual, as in water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A Journal of Power and EnergySame topicWind Energy Research and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207