MEDB-49. Relapsed SHH medulloblastomas in young children. Are there alternatives to full-dose craniospinal irradiation?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND/RATIONAL: Following initial irradiation sparing therapy, many young children with relapsed medulloblastoma can be salvaged with craniospinal irradiation (CSI). However, the interval to relapse is short and neurocognitive sequelae remain a major concern. The contribution of molecular subgrouping may help refine indications and modalities of salvage strategies in this population. METHOD: From a cohort of 151 young children with molecularly characterized relapsed medulloblastoma, subset analysis of the SHH medulloblastoma was conducted to describe the practice of salvage radiotherapy and associated post-relapse survival (PRS). RESULTS: Sixty-seven SHH medulloblastoma patients (46 M0; 54 GTR; 11 non-ND/MBEN) received salvage therapy with curative intent. Before relapse, 54 (80.6%) received conventional chemotherapy (CC), 13 (19.4%) high-dose chemotherapy (HDC), while seven had additional focal radiotherapy (fRT). Median time to relapse was 11.1 months (range 3.8-41.0) and 43.3% were localized. Thirty patients (16 localized relapse) underwent surgery. Forty-seven (71.2%) received salvage radiotherapy (20 with CC; 10 with HDC; 15 alone, two unknown). CSI and fRT accounted for 82% and 18% respectively. CSI median dose was 36Gy (range 18-39Gy). Ten patients (eight with localized relapse) received CSI doses ≤23.4Gy. Nineteen patients (28.8%) did not receive any radiotherapy (nine HDC; 10 CC only). Radiotherapy was associated with better 3-year PRS (73.0% versus 36.1%; p=0.001). All patients treated with CSI ≤ 23.4Gy were alive at median follow-up of 69 months(24-142). Six of nine patients treated with HDC without irradiation were alive at last follow-up. Sixty-three percent of patients received reduced dose CSI(≤23.4Gy), fRT, or no radiotherapy, and their PRS did not significantly differ from those who received CSI ≥ 30.6Gy (p = 0.54). CONCLUSION: While salvage CSI provided PRS benefit in this SHH medulloblastoma cohort, we report the use of reduced salvage radiotherapy and irradiation avoidance in 63% of the patients, with 60% alive at last follow-up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".