MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281734278 · doi:10.1201/9781003222897-9

Optimizing the effective particle diameter of crushed rock materials to mitigate the effect of convection in a pavement structure

2022· book-chapter· en· W4281734278 on OpenAlexaff
J. Côté, N. Missaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)Université Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle (ecology)Materials scienceConvectionGeotechnical engineeringGeologyMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is common practice in Norway to use crushed rock in road structures. Recent regulations allowed a large variation of the particle size distribution in this layer. This paper focuses on the influence of effective particle size of crushed rock materials on heat transfer in pavements based on pavement structure thermal modelling using a partial differential equation solver. The normal temperature for the 1980 – 2010 period in various regions of Norway, as well as the coldest year (extreme conditions) were used together with the factor N as surface conditions of a typical pavement structure. The crushed rock was modelled using various values of effective particle diameter (d10), a material characteristic that significantly affects thermal properties of coarse materials. Along with temperature distributions, maximum frost depths were computed and expressed according to the climatic data of each site studied and as a function of the effective particle diameter. The results showed that d10 had a significant effect on frost depth mainly during the coldest winters as a result of increased heat transfer owed to natural convection. The results obtained also made it possible to establish a critical d10 value to minimize convection as a function of the mean annual air temperature, providing a simple tool to road designers for selecting the materials for subbase and frost protection layer (FPL).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207