MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Trial in progress: Phase II activity trial of high-dose radiation and chemosensitization in patients with macrometastatic lymph node spread after sentinel node biopsy in vulvar cancer: Groningen International Study on Sentinel Nodes in Vulvar Cancer III (GROINSS-V III/NRG-GY024).

2022· article· en· W4281738335 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lilian T. Gien, Brian M. Slomovitz, Mario M. Leitão, Ate G.J. van der Zee, Carien L. Creutzberg, A.K.L. Reyners, Petronella O. Witteveen, D.N. Ayala-Peacock, Jyoti Mayadev, Charles A. Leath, Maaike H.M. Oonk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersNational Institutes of HealthKWF Kankerbestrijding
KeywordsMedicineVulvar cancerSentinel lymph nodeClinical endpointSentinel nodeSurgeryRadiation therapySupraclavicular lymph nodesPrimary tumorPhases of clinical researchCancerMetastasisBreast cancerInternal medicineVulvaChemotherapyRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS5624 Background: Early stage invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is treated by radical excision of the primary tumor combined with a sentinel node (SN) procedure for the groins. GROINSS-VI and GOG-173 demonstrated that if there is no metastasis to the SN, then standard of care is observation. GROINSS-VII/GOG-270 demonstrated that micrometastatic disease (<2mm) to the SN requires standard radiotherapy (50 Gy) without the need for an inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL). This study also found that patients with macrometastasis ( > 2mm) required IFL in order to have an acceptably low groin recurrence rate. However, IFL is associated with significant morbidity such as lymphedema, wound healing issues, and recurrent infections. It is hypothesized that for those with macrometastasis ( > 2 mm) in the SN, the efficacy of treatment can be increased by giving a higher dose of radiotherapy along with chemosensitization. Methods: This is an international multicenter single-arm phase II prospective clinical trial. The primary objective is to investigate the safety of replacing IFL by chemoradiation in early-stage vulvar cancer patients with a macrometastasis ( > 2mm) and/or extracapsular extension in the SN. The primary endpoint is the groin recurrence rate in the first two years after primary treatment. Secondary endpoints are short and long-term morbidity associated with the SN procedure and chemoradiation and quality of life as measured by EORTC-QLQc30. Patients with invasive ( > 1mm) squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva, stage T1, tumor size < 4 cm diameter and no suspicious lymph nodes by imaging of the groins will proceed with SN detection. Institutions enrolling patients must demonstrate prior surgical experience with SN detection with the submission of at least 10 successfully completed cases in vulvar cancer. Patients with SN metastases > 2mm and/or with extracapsular extension or those with > 1 SN with micrometastases will be eligible for this study. Treatment will consist of chemoradiation with a dose of 56 Gy to the groin combined with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, 15, 21 and 29 of radiotherapy. One hundred and fifty-seven patients in Europe, United States and Canada will be enrolled. The study includes continuous monitoring of groin recurrences with stopping rules. Results of this trial may be practice changing and eliminate the need for IFL in all women with clinically early stage vulvar cancer. The study is currently open for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT05076942.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→