GCT-22. OUTCOMES OF CHILDREN WITH LOCALIZED AND METASTATIC GERMINOMA TREATED WITH CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY RADIATION THERAPY WITHOUT PRIMARY TUMOR BOOST
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND: Response-based radiation therapy has been the approach for germinoma after chemotherapy. However, the presence of residual lesions at the end of chemotherapy did not demonstrate a negative impact on progression-free survival (PFS). Similarly, resection of residual tumors after chemotherapy did not show a survival benefit. AIM: Our study objective was to determine long-term outcomes of a cohort who received chemotherapy and radiation therapy without primary tumor boost even in the absence of complete response to chemotherapy. METHOD: This retrospective study analyzed the outcome of germinoma patients diagnosed and treated at a tertiary care center from January 2006 to December 2021. RESULTS: Twenty-nine children (14 male; median age 12.8 years) were identified. Median follow-up was 63 months (range 9-187 months). Twenty children had localized disease and tumor location was suprasellar (n= 9), pineal (n= 10), and bifocal (n= 1) while 9 children had metastatic disease at presentation. All patients completed multi-agent chemotherapy followed by either whole ventricular (WVI) (23.4 Gy) (n = 23), whole brain (WBI) (23.4 Gy) (n = 5) or craniospinal radiation (CSI) (23.4 Gy) (n= 1). Two children, who had localized disease at presentation and received WVI after chemotherapy, relapsed 9 months and 32 months after completion of treatment respectively. None of them had local relapses. Location of relapse was distant, outside (n= 1) and inside (n= 1) the radiation field. Five-year PFS was 93% and overall survival (OS) was 100%. CONCLUSION: In this limited experience, excellent 5-year PFS and OS rates were achieved with chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy delivered without primary tumor boost. This study also demonstrated the absence of local relapse despite omitting primary tumor boost in patients with localized and metastatic germinoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".