Real-world outcomes of patients with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy without adjuvant ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
584 Background: HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy has favourable outcomes, especially for those attaining pathologic complete response (pCR). Among those with residual invasive disease (RD), outcomes are variable. Replacing adjuvant trastuzumab with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) reduces the risk of recurrence, but increases toxicity and cost. The magnitude of benefit of T-DM1 may be small among patients with RD and favourable prognostic features. Here we report on real-world outcomes of patients with HER2-positive EBC treated with neoadjuvant therapy without adjuvant T-DM1. Methods: We performed a single institution, retrospective review of HER2-positive EBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab between January 1st, 2012 and February 1, 2021. We excluded patients who received adjuvant T-DM1. We collected clinical and pathologic characteristics, treatment data, and outcomes events. We estimated 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), a validated endpoint in HER2-positive EBC, using Kaplan-Meier with recurrence and/or death as events. Outcomes were reported in subgroups based on known prognostic factors. The study was approved by the University Health Network Research Ethics Board. Results: The study comprised 193 patients with a median follow-up of 30 months. The majority (n=160, 83%) received neoadjuvant anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy; 42 (22%) received neoadjuvant pertuzumab. All received adjuvant trastuzumab. Median age was 53 years (range 25-87), 113 (59%) patients had estrogen receptor (ER) positive disease, and 82 (42%) had pCR. In total, 16 events were observed, of which 13 (81%) were distant recurrences (including 5 (31%) in the brain) and 3 (19%) were locoregional. Of these, 14 (88%) occurred in the first 3 years of follow-up. Estimated 3-year DFS was 98.6% in patients with pCR, and 85.4% in patients with RD. Patients with ER positive disease had excellent outcomes, regardless of pathologic nodal (ypN) status. The highest risk of recurrence was in ER negative and ypN positive disease (Table). Conclusions: Real-world outcomes of patients with HER2-positive EBC treated with neoadjuvant therapy without adjuvant T-DM1 are favorable, including those with RD if ER positive. The expected benefit of adjuvant T-DM1 in this group is therefore likely to be small. Patients with ER- disease had poorer outcomes irrespective of nodal status. Further research to identify patients with RD for whom the benefit of T-DM1 is unlikely to merit its added toxicity and cost is warranted. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".