MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281754482 · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcac142

In vivo myelin imaging and tissue microstructure in white matter hyperintensities and perilesional white matter

2022· article· en· W4281754482 on OpenAlexafffund
Jennifer K. Ferris, Brian Greeley, Irene M. Vavasour, Sarah N. Kraeutner, Shie Rinat, Joel Ramirez, Sandra E. Black, Lara A. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of British Columbia HospitalUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsWhite matterDiffusion MRIHyperintensityFractional anisotropyMyelinPathologyMagnetic resonance imagingMedicineInternal medicineCentral nervous systemRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract White matter hyperintensities negatively impact white matter structure and relate to cognitive decline in aging. Diffusion tensor imaging detects changes to white matter microstructure, both within the white matter hyperintensity and extending into surrounding (perilesional) normal-appearing white matter. However, diffusion tensor imaging markers are not specific to tissue components, complicating the interpretation of previous microstructural findings. Myelin water imaging is a novel imaging technique that provides specific markers of myelin content (myelin water fraction) and interstitial fluid (geometric mean T2). Here we combined diffusion tensor imaging and myelin water imaging to examine tissue characteristics in white matter hyperintensities and perilesional white matter in 80 individuals (47 older adults and 33 individuals with chronic stroke). To measure perilesional normal-appearing white matter, white matter hyperintensity masks were dilated in 2 mm segments up to 10 mm in distance from the white matter hyperintensity. Fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, myelin water fraction, and geometric mean T2 were extracted from white matter hyperintensities and perilesional white matter. We observed a spatial gradient of higher mean diffusivity and geometric mean T2, and lower fractional anisotropy, in the white matter hyperintensity and perilesional white matter. In the chronic stroke group, myelin water fraction was reduced in the white matter hyperintensity but did not show a spatial gradient in perilesional white matter. Across the entire sample, white matter metrics within the white matter hyperintensity related to whole-brain white matter hyperintensity volume; with increasing white matter hyperintensity volume there was increased mean diffusivity and geometric mean T2, and decreased myelin water fraction in the white matter hyperintensity. Normal-appearing white matter adjacent to white matter hyperintensities exhibits characteristics of a transitional stage between healthy white matter and white matter hyperintensities. This effect was observed in markers sensitive to interstitial fluid, but not in myelin water fraction, the specific marker of myelin concentration. Within the white matter hyperintensity, interstitial fluid was higher and myelin concentration was lower in individuals with more severe cerebrovascular disease. Our data suggests white matter hyperintensities have penumbra-like effects in perilesional white matter that specifically reflect increased interstitial fluid, with no changes to myelin concentration. In contrast, within the white matter hyperintensity there are varying levels of demyelination, which vary based on the severity of cerebrovascular disease. Diffusion tensor imaging and myelin imaging may be useful clinical markers to predict white matter hyperintensity formation, and to stage neuronal damage within white matter hyperintensities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207