MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281755797 · doi:10.3390/min12060675

Reservoir Characterization of a Tight Gas Field Using New Modified Type Curves for Production Data Analysis—A Case Study from Ordos Basin

2022· article· en· W4281755797 on OpenAlexaff
Chang Su, Lu Kefeng, Wanju Yuan, Gang Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueMinerals · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaGeological Survey of Canada
FundersChina National Offshore Oil Corporation
KeywordsTight gasNatural gas fieldReservoir modelingInflowGeologyFormation evaluationPetroleum engineeringWell loggingPorosityPermeability (electromagnetism)Dimensionless quantityStructural basinProductivityPetrologyGeotechnical engineeringNatural gasMechanicsEngineeringGeomorphologyHydraulic fracturingChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using data from 56 tight gas wells from the study field (Y field) in the Ordos basin of China, this paper presents performance-based reservoir characterization of the study field from production data and geophysical data. Post-fracturing evaluation is realized by applying our new modified production decline type curves for fractured wells. Compared to traditional type curves, our newly proposed modified dimensionless type curves help identify field data diagnostics for various flow regimes of fractured wells and also facilitate the curve matching process with real data to obtain fruitful and crucial reservoir and fractured well information, including key parameters such as reservoir flowing capacity (kh), well productivity, fracture length, drainage area and original gas in place. This paper intends to promote the extensive application of this new technique. With the support of the reservoir information provided by production decline analysis using our modified type curves, the commercial flow units are delineated in terms of interrelated porosity-permeability of sandstone based on pore throat aperture crossplotting and corresponding flow unit productivity. Furthermore, two crossplots of well logging interpreted porosity versus resistivity are constructed, suggesting their good correlated relationships with relative flow unit productivity and initial gas abundance in place, respectively. The two crossplots enable qualitative evaluation of formation penetrated by well, which makes them very useful and practical as wireline logging is basically available for every well. The well production routine is also analyzed systematically by considering a well’s inflow performance, tubing performance and minimal liquid-carrying gas flow rate to investigate if a gas well is producing at optimal conditions or if a measure should be taken to improve the well’s production. Through analysis of the Y field, this study introduces an integrated workflow with the support of the new modified type curves to effectively help understand the reservoir characteristics and the flow behaviors of the tight gas field. The key takeaway from this study is that the new modified dimensionless production decline curves in terms of qDM vs. tDM can be applied in field practice to achieve a systematically comparable understanding of the performance of MHFHWs globally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMineralsSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207