MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281756767 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsac079.533

0536 Association of a Novel EEG Biomarker of Sleep Depth with Sleep Disordered Breathing in Adolescents

2022· article· en· W4281756767 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Ricci, Fan He, Susan L. Calhoun, Jidong Fang, Alexandros N. Vgontzas, Duanping Liao, Edward O. Bixler, Magdy Younes, Julio Fernández‐Mendoza

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNon-rapid eye movement sleepPolysomnographyObstructive sleep apneaSleep (system call)AudiologyMedicineElectroencephalographySleep apneaWakefulnessPsychologyApneaAnesthesiaPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction The odds ratio product (ORP) provides a standardized, continuous measure of sleep depth that ranges from 0 (deep sleep) to 2.5 (full wakefulness). ORP has been shown to increase during adolescence, representing the decline in sleep depth that occurs during this developmental period. In adults, higher ORP has been associated with sleep disordered breathing (SDB), including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), while there have been no studies in youth. We aimed to determine the association of ORP with SDB in adolescents. Methods We extracted ORP from the sleep EEG of 261 typically developing adolescents aged 12-23y (median 16y) from the Penn State Child Cohort. Higher ORP during rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM sleep indicates less deep sleep, while higher ORP-9 (i.e., average ORP in the 9-seconds following non-REM cortical arousals) indicates greater arousability. We used general linear models, adjusted for sex, age and race/ethnicity, to examine mean differences in ORP metrics among clinically meaningful groups of SDB based on the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) consisting of no SDB (AHI<2 and no snoring, n=100), primary snoring (AHI<2 and snoring, n=75), 2≤AHI<5 (n=64), and AHI≥5 (n=22). Results Adolescents with primary snoring or 2≤AHI<5 did not significantly differ in ORP metrics from those without SDB (all p≥0.12). Adolescents with AHI≥5 had higher ORP-NREM compared to those without SDB, with primary snoring or with 2≤AHI<5 (all p≤0.01), while ORP-REM was significantly higher compared to those without SDB (p=0.02). ORP-9 was significantly greater in adolescents with AHI≥5 compared to those with no SDB (p<0.01) and those with primary snoring (p=0.02), but not when compared to those with 2≤AHI<5 (p=0.07). Conclusion Our data suggest that adolescents with OSA experience lower REM and non-REM sleep depth/intensity (higher ORP) compared to those without SDB. In addition, these adolescents experience a slower progression back to deep sleep following cortical arousals (higher ORP-9), which suggests they remain in a high arousability state and, thus, are more likely to repeat arousals. Commensurate with previous studies in adults, our data show that ORP is a useful sleep EEG biomarker able to capture decreased sleep depth in adolescents with OSA. Support (If Any) National Institutes of Health (R01MH118308, UL1TR000127)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207