MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281760711 · doi:10.3390/geomatics2020013

Automated Modeling of Road Networks for High-Definition Maps in OpenDRIVE Format Using Mobile Mapping Measurements

2022· article· en· W4281760711 on OpenAlexaff
Kai‐Wei Chiang, Hao-Yu Pai, Jhih-Cing Zeng, Meng-Lun Tsai, Naser El‐Sheimy

Bibliographic record

VenueGeomatics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePoint cloudInterpolation (computer graphics)Road mapData miningArtificial intelligenceGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With growing attention being devoted to autonomous vehicle (AV) safety, people have recently attached importance to high-definition (HD) maps. HD maps are not limited by environmental factors and can limit AVs driving in certain lanes. HD maps provide accurate auxiliary information on factors such as road geometry, traffic sign placement, and traffic topology. Nowadays, most HD maps are made from point clouds data, and this data contains accurate 3D position information. However, the production costs associated with HD maps are substantial. This article proposes an algorithm that reduces a great amount of time and human resource. The algorithm is divided into three phases, lane lines’ extraction from point clouds, modelling lane lines with attributes, and building OpenDRIVE file. The algorithm extracts lane lines resting on intensity value within the range of roads. Next, it models lane lines by cubic spline interpolation with the result of first phase, and build the OpenDRIVE file following the announcement of OpenDRIVE. The final result is compared with the verified HD map from the mapping company to analyze the accuracy. The root mean square (RMSE) obtained were 0.069 and 0.079 m for 2D and 3D maps, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeomaticsSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207