MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) as first-line treatment in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring HER2 exon 19 or 20 mutations (DESTINY-Lung04).

2022· article· en· W4281764145 on OpenAlexaff
Bob T. Li, Myung‐Ju Ahn, Kōichi Goto, Julien Mazieres, Sukhmani K. Padda, William Nassib William, Yi‐Long Wu, Simon Dearden, Alejandra Ragone, Natasha Viglianti, Amaya Gascó

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Canadian institutionsAstraZeneca (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineOncologynon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)TrastuzumabKRASMetastatic breast cancerPhases of clinical researchCancerLung cancerClinical trialBreast cancerColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS9137 Background: The standard of care (SOC) for patients with oncogene driver subsets of metastatic NSCLC is guided by specific molecular characterization and includes immunotherapy, chemoimmunotherapy, and matched targeted therapies. Although targeting HER2 has transformed the care of patients with breast and gastric cancers, there is currently no approved HER2-targeted therapy for NSCLC. T-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. In a cohort of pretreated patients (median, 2 prior lines) with unresectable or metastatic HER2-mutant NSCLC, T-DXd demonstrated durable and robust anticancer activity, with a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 55% and median duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of 9.3, 8.2, and 17.8 months, respectively (Li et al. N Engl J Med. 2022). Given the efficacy observed in later-line settings and the unmet need for targeted therapies in patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC, evaluating the efficacy of T-DXd in the first-line setting vs SOC is important to determine the optimal treatment. Here we describe the phase 3 DESTINY-Lung04 trial (NCT05048797) evaluating T-DXd as a first-line treatment in patients with NSCLC harboring HER2 mutations. Methods: DESTINY-Lung04 is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of first-line T-DXd vs SOC in patients with unresectable, locally advanced (not amenable to curative therapy), or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC with HER2 exon 19 or 20 mutations (detected in tissue or circulating tumor DNA). Patients must be naive to systemic therapy with palliative intent in the locally advanced or metastatic disease setting and must not have tumors with EGFR or other targetable oncogenic alterations. Patients with brain metastases must have previously completed local therapy. Patients will be randomized to receive T-DXd or SOC (platinum [investigator’s choice of cisplatin or carboplatin], pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab). The primary endpoint is PFS defined by RECIST version 1.1 per blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints include OS, ORR, and DOR (by RECIST 1.1 per BICR and investigator), investigator-assessed PFS (by RECIST 1.1) and time to second progression or death (per local standard clinical practice), central nervous system PFS (by RECIST 1.1 per BICR), landmark PFS at 12 months (by RECIST 1.1 per BICR and investigator), and landmark OS at 24 months. Safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and patient-reported outcomes, including pulmonary symptoms and tolerability, will be assessed. Clinical trial information: NCT05048797.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.241
GPT teacher head0.567
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchFrench-language works237,207