Deep learning models of cognitive processes constrained by human brain connectomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Decoding cognitive processes from recordings of brain activity has been an active topic in neuroscience research for decades. Traditional decoding studies focused on pattern classification in specific regions of interest and averaging brain activity over many trials. Recently, brain decoding with graph neural networks has been shown to scale at fine temporal resolution and on the full brain, achieving state-of-the-art performance on the human connectome project benchmark. The reason behind this success is likely the strong inductive connectome prior that enables the integration of distributed patterns of brain activity. Yet, the nature of such inductive bias is still poorly understood. In this work, we investigate the impact of the inclusion of multiple path lengths (through high-order graph convolution), the homogeneity of brain parcels (graph nodes), and the type of interactions (graph edges). We evaluate the decoding models on a large population of 1200 participants, under 21 different experimental conditions, acquired from the Human Connectome Project database. Our findings reveal that the optimal choice for large-scale cognitive decoding is to propagate neural dynamics within empirical functional connectomes and integrate brain dynamics using high-order graph convolutions. In this setting, the model exhibits high decoding accuracy and robustness against adversarial attacks on the graph architecture, including randomization in functional connectomes and lesions in targeted brain regions and networks. The trained model relies on biologically meaningful features for the prediction of cognitive states and generates task-specific graph representations resembling task-evoked activation maps. These results demonstrate that a full-brain integrative model is critical for the large-scale brain decoding. Our study establishes principles of how to effectively leverage human connectome constraints in deep graph neural networks, providing new avenues to study the neural substrates of human cognition at scale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".