Minimal sensor arrays for localizing objects using an electric sense
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Weakly electric fish encode perturbations in a self-generated electric field to sense their environment. Localizing objects using this electric sense requires that distance be decoded from a two-dimensional electric image of the field perturbations on their skin. Many studies of object localization by weakly electric fish, and by electric sensing in a generic context, have focused on extracting location information from different features of the electric image. Some of these studies have also considered the additional information gained from sampling the electric image at different times, and from different viewpoints. Here, we take a different perspective and instead consider the information available at a single point in space (i.e. a single sensor or receptor) at a single point in time (i.e. constant field). By combining the information from multiple receptors, we show that an object’s distance can be unambiguously encoded by as few as four receptors at specific locations on a sensing surface in a manner that is relatively robust to environmental noise. This provides a lower bound on the information (i.e. receptor array size) required to decode the three-dimensional location of an object using an electric sense.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".