MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281778935 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsac079.599

0602 Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep Duration Is Inversely Related To Daytime Pruritus Severity: Preliminary Findings in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Patients

2022· article· en· W4281778935 on OpenAlexaff
Madhulika A. Gupta, Aditya K. Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWestern University
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineRapid eye movement sleepInsomniaAnesthesiaPsychologyAudiologyPsychiatryElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Pruritus (itching) is one of the most distressing symptoms of dermatologic disease. There can be a bidirectional relationship between pruritus severity and sleep. Pruritus during sleep is most frequently encountered during stages N1 and N2 and sleep fragmentation can exacerbate pruritus. Often there are limited effective treatments available for pruritus. In this study we examined REM sleep data obtained from PTSD patients who reported somatic complaints including daytime pruritus. To our knowledge there are no studies of REM sleep and pruritus during wakefulness. Methods Seventy-five consenting patients with mild-to-moderate PTSD (all female; mean ±SD age 48.89 ±13.50 years) completed a battery of psychiatric and sleep ratings and underwent ≥ 1 home sleep apnea test (Watch PAT200; Itamar) which provided measures of %REM and REM duration. Exclusion criteria were use of benzodiazepines or narcotics. Pruritus was measured using Item 2 of the Pennebaker Inventory of Limbic Languidness (PILL), which assesses the frequency of common physical symptoms. For PILL Item 2 patients self-rated the frequency with which they experienced “Itchy eyes or skin” with a rating of “1” = “”never or almost never”, “2”=”less than 3 or 4 times per year”, “3”=”every month or so”, “4”=”every week or so’, and”5”=”more than once every week”. Results The mean±SD % REM was 21.78 ±7.64 (range 1.76% to 40.69%); and overall duration of REM sleep (mean ±SD) was 91.37±38.20 minutes (range 5.01 to 194.47 minutes). The frequency of pruritus ratings were as follows:: 39.5% endorsed a rating of “5” . The remainder self-endorsed the following frequencies: “4” (15.8%), “3” (21.1%), “2” (15.8%), and “1” (7.9%).. Pearson product moment correlation between the pruritus rating (item 2 of PILL) and REM sleep parameters were as follows: % REM (Pearson r= -0.172; p=0.144) and REM duration (Pearson r= -0.247; p=0.035). Conclusion Daytime pruritus was inversely related to the duration of REM sleep in a sample of PTSD patients. Pruritus can be a difficult condition to manage. Optimization of REM sleep may have a role in the management of pruritus. Support (If Any) None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207