Risk-adjusted safety analysis of pacritinib (PAC) in patients (pts) with myelofibrosis (MF).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
7058 Background: PAC is a novel JAK2/IRAK1 inhibitor that has shown significant activity in pts with MF, including those with platelet (plt) counts <50×109/L. Recently, JAK inhibitors have come under increased scrutiny due to specific, emerging toxicities with drugs in this class. This safety analysis focuses on these toxicities of interest for pts treated with PAC 200 mg BID and best available therapy (BAT), including ruxolitinib (RUX), on the Phase 3 PERSIST-2 and Phase 2 PAC203 studies. Data are presented as risk-adjusted incidences to account for differential time at risk for adverse events (AEs) between arms due to cross-over. Methods: Pts treated with PAC 200 mg BID on PERSIST-2 and PAC203, and those treated with BAT on PERSIST-2, were included. Risk-adjusted AEs, representing event rate per 100 patient-years (pt-yrs), were calculated for overall and fatal AEs, bleeding AEs (determined by Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Query [SMQ]), cardiac AEs (by SMQ), major cardiac events (per major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE] classification), infections, thromboses, and secondary malignancies. Results: A total of 160 pts were analyzed as the pooled PAC group (n=106 in PERSIST-2; n=54 in PAC203) and 98 pts in the BAT group (44 on RUX). At baseline, median plt count was 57×109/L; 61% had prior JAK2 inhibitor therapy. The rate of AEs was higher on PAC versus BAT, while the rate of fatal AEs was lower (Table). Both bleeding and cardiac events occurred at slightly lower rates on PAC compared to BAT. There were no MACE events on PAC, whereas there were on BAT. Malignant neoplasms occurred at similar rates on PAC and BAT, though rate of non-melanoma skin cancers was lower in pooled PAC (3/100 pt-yrs) versus BAT (7/100 pt-yrs), including RUX (11/100 pt-yrs). Infection occurred more frequently on PAC, though fungal and viral infections occurred less frequently, as did herpes zoster reactivation (pooled PAC: 0/100 pt-yrs vs BAT: 2.4/100 pt-yrs, including RUX: 5.5/100 pt-yrs). Thrombosis occurred at similar rates on PAC and BAT. Conclusions: Risk-adjusted analysis demonstrates that the safety profile of PAC 200 mg BID is comparable or superior to BAT, including RUX. PAC 200 mg BID may represent a full-dose therapeutic option for pts with MF, including those with thrombocytopenia. Clinical trial information: NCT02055781; NCT04884191. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".