MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Long-term medical and functional outcomes of medulloblastoma survivors: A population-based, matched cohort study.

2022· article· en· W4281780127 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Hallie Coltin, Priscila Pequeno, Ning Liu, Derek S. Tsang, Michael D. Taylor, Éric Bouffet, Paul C. Nathan, Vijay Ramaswamy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreHospital for Sick Children
FundersGarron Family Cancer Centre
KeywordsMedicineMedulloblastomaNational Death IndexHazard ratioPopulationCancer registryCohortProportional hazards modelPediatricsCancerMedical recordInternal medicineConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10053 Background: Most medulloblastoma survivors suffer from late treatment-related sequelae. There are no population-based studies examining such late effects in a dedicated cohort of medulloblastoma survivors. Methods: Using a provincial pediatric cancer registry, all 5+ year medulloblastoma survivors diagnosed between 1987-2015 at <18 years of age in Ontario, Canada were identified and matched to cancer-free population controls based on age, sex, and geographical location. Cases were followed from the index date (five years from latest of diagnosis, or relapse/subsequent malignancy prior to age 18 years) until December 31, 2020 or censorship (death, or relapse/new cancer after age 18 years). Clinical data were linked to administrative health databases to estimate the cumulative incidences and cause-specific hazard ratios (HR) of mortality, hospitalizations, strokes, hearing loss requiring a hearing aid, and receipt of homecare services between cohorts, accounting for matching and competing risks. We evaluated demographic, disease, and treatment predictors of mortality using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Of 389 medulloblastoma diagnoses in the study period, 159 (40.9%) were excluded, most commonly due to early death prior to the index date. Two hundred thirty cases were matched to 1150 controls (Table). Ten-year survival probability after index was 92.4% in cases and 99.4% in controls (HR 21.5, 95% CI 9.8-54.0). Cases were at higher risk for hospitalizations (HR 3.4, 95% CI 2.7-4.3), stroke (HR 45.6, 95% CI 12.8-289.8), hearing loss (HR 96.3, 95% CI 39.7-317.3), and requiring homecare services (HR 7.9, 95% CI 5.8-10.9). By 10 years after index, 4.8% (95% CI 2.2-9.0) of survivors had experienced a stroke compared to 0.1% (95% CI 0.01-0.7) of controls. None of the candidate predictors were significantly associated with mortality on univariate analyses. Conclusions: Survivors of childhood medulloblastoma experienced an increased risk of mortality and serious morbidity compared to population controls. Consideration for mitigation strategies or early interventions for preventing neurovascular sequelae and hearing loss is warranted, as is dedicated supports for survivors. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→