RARE-23. Preservation of endocrine function after Ommaya reservoir insertion in children with cystic craniopharyngioma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract INTRODUCTION: Children with craniopharyngiomas (CP) can be subjected to significant morbidities caused by radical surgery and/or radiation with deleterious long-term consequences. Ommaya reservoir insertion (ORI) into cystic CP represents a minimally invasive procedure allowing immediate decompression and aims to avoid additional injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the relevance of upfront ORI (+/- intracystic treatment) for preservation of endocrine function. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of children with CP treated at the Hospital for Sick Children between 01/01/2000 and 15/01/2020 for review of endocrinological outcome after ORI. Endocrine function was reviewed at the time of initial surgery and throughout the course of follow-up. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time to further surgical resection or irradiation. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were identified with a median age of 8.3 (range 2.1-18.0) years, 31 were males. Sixty-six patients underwent surgical treatment, including 41 ORI. ORI was performed as upfront treatment in 32 patients; 33 patients underwent gross total or partial resection and 1 patient radiotherapy as first treatment. Fifty-five of 79 patients had sufficient endocrine follow-up data. Endocrine function remained stable after ORI with a mean EFS of 27.64 (± 5.22) months. Surgical resection was associated with worsened endocrine function postoperatively with an EFS of 5.48 (± 1.74) months (p< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Upfront ORI (+/- intracystic treatment) resulted in endocrine preservation of all patients and a significantly longer EFS when compared to upfront surgical resection in this single institutional retrospective review. Further analyses will elucidate the implications of ORI with respect to ophthalmological, vascular and neurocognitive outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".