MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281782836

Sceaux, Domaine de Sceaux - Pavillon de Hanovre (Hauts-de-Seine, Île-de-France): Rapport de diagnostic archéologique

2022· preprint· fr· W4281782836 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-David Desforges

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European History and Architecture
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette opération de diagnostic archéologique a été réalisée dans la partie occidentale du Domaine départemental de Sceaux, aux abords du Pavillon de Hanovre, en prévision d’une requalification du secteur. Depuis 1931, ce bâtiment du XVIIIe siècle, partiellement déplacé du boulevard des Italiens de Paris, se dresse en position éminente dans le parc, au centre d’un vaste rond-point participant à une mise en scène paysagère. Les aménagements mis au jour traduisent la restauration du parc sous la direction de l’architecte Léon Azéma (1888-1978), avec de vastes allées pavées et bitumées et la présence de bosquets. Des dépotoirs et des fosses de plantation, remplis de gravats, révèlent le vaste chantier des années 1930. Ces travaux ont raboté les sédiments au point qu’un seul témoin du parcellaire ancien reste perceptible, sans pouvoir être précisément daté. Cette partie du domaine, acquise par Antoine Colbert de Seignelay (1651-1690) sur les terres agricoles du chapitre de Paris (seigneurie de Châtenay), est aux confins des territoires de Sceaux, Antony et Châtenay-Malabry, loin des centres de peuplement connus par les archives ou l’archéologie. Ce diagnostic a été l’occasion d’une synthèse documentaire sur le Pavillon de Hanovre et sur le Parc de Sceaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicMedieval European History and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207