20-OR: The Renal and Vascular Effects of Combined SGLT2 and Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this mechanistic trial was to determine the kidney and cardiovascular effects of combined treatment with an SGLT2i (empagliflozin 25mg QD) and an ACEi (ramipril 10mg QD) for 4 weeks in patients at risk of renal hyperfiltration. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial, measurements were obtained following each of the 4 treatment phases: 1) no treatment, 2) 4-week ramipril treatment alone, 3) 4-week empagliflozin-ramipril combination treatment, and 4) 4-week placebo-ramipril combination treatment. The primary endpoint was GFR after empagliflozin-ramipril treatment compared to placebo-ramipril. At the end of each study phase the following measurements were performed under clamped euglycemia (4-6 mmol/L) : inulin (GFR) and paraaminohippurate (effective renal plasma flow, ERPF) clearances, tubular sodium handling, ambulatory blood pressure, arterial stiffness, heart rate variability, non-invasive cardiac output monitoring, plasma and urine biochemistry. Empagliflozin-ramipril treatment resulted in an 8ml/min/1.73m2 lower GFR (p=0.0061) , lower absolute proximal fluid reabsorption rate (p=0.0092) , lower absolute proximal sodium reabsorption rate (p=0.0056) , and lower urinary 8-isoprostane (p=0.0084) relative to placebo-ramipril treatment. Empagliflozin-ramipril treatment resulted in additive blood pressure lowering effects (SBP p=0.0112; DBP p=0.0032) and a lower total peripheral resistance (p=0.0368) . There were no other significant changes observed with the addition of empagliflozin. SGLT2i-ACEi combination treatment resulted in an expected GFR “dip”, suppression of oxidative stress markers, and additive declines in blood pressure and total peripheral resistance in this mechanistic study. These changes are consistent with a protective physiological profile characterized by the lowering of intraglomerular pressure and related cardiorenal risk when adding an SGLT2i to conservative therapy. Disclosure Y. Lytvyn: None. K. Kimura: Employee; 3Boehringer Ingelheim Canada Ltd./Ltée. N. Peter: Employee; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG. V.S. Lai: Advisory Panel; Baxter. J. Tse: None. L. Cham: None. B.A. Perkins: Advisory Panel; Abbott Diabetes, Insulet Corporation, Sanofi. Board Member; Novo Nordisk. Research Support; BMO Bank of Montreal, Novo Nordisk. Other Relationship; Abbott Diabetes, Insulet Corporation, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk. N. Soleymanlou: Employee; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. D. Cherney: Research Support; Boehringer Ingelheim-Lilly, Merck, Janssen, Sanofi, AstraZeneca and Novo-Nordisk. Other Relationship; AbbVie Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Lilly, Maze, BMS, CSL-Behring, Merck, Otsuka, Novartis and Novo-Nordisk, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Sanofi. Funding Boehringer Ingelheim and CIHR, Diabetes Canada and the Heart and Stroke Richard Lewar Centre of Excellence and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".