MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281790126 · doi:10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.003

A 135° short inlay humeral stem leads to comparable radiographic and clinical outcomes compared with a standard-length stem for reverse shoulder arthroplasty

2022· article· en· W4281790126 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brandon J. Erickson, Patrick J. Denard, Justin W. Griffin, Thomas Wittmann, Patric Raiss, Reuben Gobezie, Evan Lederman, Brian C. Werner

Bibliographic record

VenueJSES International · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArthrex
KeywordsMedicineRadiographyArthroplastyRange of motionElbowSurgeryStress shieldingOsteoarthritisRetrospective cohort studyImplant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Humeral stem length in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has decreased in recent years in an attempt to preserve more bone and facilitate stem removal in the revision setting. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a short- to standard-length stem RTSA. The authors hypothesized that there would be no difference in radiographic or clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up. Methods Patients who underwent RTSA using a press-fit standard- or short-length humeral component with a consistent geometry (Univers Revers, or Revers Apex; Arthrex, Inc., Naples, FL, USA) were evaluated in a multicenter retrospective review. The minimum clinical follow-up was 2 years. Immediate postoperative radiographs were used to assess initial alignment and filling ratios. In addition, radiographs at 2 years were evaluated for signs of stress shielding and/or loosening. Clinical outcome scores and range of motion were evaluated at the final follow-up and compared between groups. Results A total of 220 patients with short-stem RTSA and 357 patients with standard-length stem RTSA were analyzed. There was no difference in baseline function between short- and standard-length stem patients. Patients in the short stem group had higher postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (84.6 vs. 80.8; P = .014) and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (86.5 vs. 82.7; P = .025). Patients in the short stem group also had greater postoperative active forward flexion (139° vs. 132°; P = .003) and internal rotation with the arm at 90° of abduction (43° vs. 32°; P < .001) than patients in the standard-length group. Radiographically, there was a higher metaphyseal ( P = .049) and diaphyseal ( P < .001) fill ratio in the short stem group, although there was no difference in postoperative alignment, radiographic signs of loosening, or revision for loosening between groups (all P > .05). Conclusion A short inlay stem leads to comparable radiographic findings and revision-free survival compared with a standard-length stem when placed with a press-fit technique for RTSA. Clinical outcomes are also equivalent or slightly improved with a short stem compared with a standard-length stem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJSES InternationalSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207