Research Note: Effect of light intensity of calcium homeostasis in pullets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The impact of varying light intensities on layer pullets is not yet well understood. Behaviorally, brighter illumination may increase pullet activity levels by allowing better navigation in the complexity of non-cage systems. In addition, light intensity was previously demonstrated to affect the levels of calcium and phosphate regulating hormones in mice. The objective of this study was to examine how exposure of pullets to different light intensity affects their calcium and phosphorus homeostasis. Lohmann LSL-Lite and Lohmann Brown-Lite pullets were randomized into 4 individually controlled rooms with 6 pens per room, which were assigned to 10 or 50 lux light intensity supplied via white LED lighting during the photophase. After 8 and 16 wk of exposure, plasma calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium were measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry; and parathyroid hormone, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, fibroblast growth factor 23, and markers of bone formation and resorption were measured by ELISA. Intestine and kidney samples were collected at 16 wk and gene expression of receptors for calcium and phosphate regulating hormones was assessed. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Lohmann Brown-Lite pullets exposed to 50 lux for 8 wk exhibited lower ionized Ca levels and a trend for increased bone formation markers compared to pullets reared in 10 lux. Thus, higher light intensity during rearing may beneficially affect calcium homeostasis and bone formation in young Lohmann Brown-Lite chicken.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".