MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281806468 · doi:10.3389/fmats.2022.813407

Engineering Silicon Oxide by Argon Ion Implantation for High Performance Resistance Switching

2022· article· en· W4281806468 on OpenAlexaff
Longfei Zhao, Wing H. Ng, Andrew P. Knights, D. V. Stevanovic, Daniel J. Mannion, Adnan Mehonić, Anthony J. Kenyon

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Materials · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilRoyal Academy of EngineeringLeverhulme Trust
KeywordsElectroformingArgonMaterials scienceSiliconOptoelectronicsIon implantationReset (finance)OxideIonDeposition (geology)VoltageLayer (electronics)NanotechnologyElectrical engineeringChemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report that implanting argon ions into a film of uniform atomic layer deposition (ALD)-grown SiOx enables electroforming and switching within films that previously failed to electroform at voltages <15 V. We note an implantation dose dependence of electroforming success rate: electroforming can be eliminated when the dosage is high enough. Our devices are capable of multi-level switching during both set and reset operations, and multiple resistance states can be retained for more than 30,000 s under ambient conditions. High endurance of more than 7 million (7.9 × 106) cycles is achieved alongside low switching voltages (±1 V). Comparing SiOx fabricated by this approach with sputtered SiOx we find similar conduction mechanisms between the two materials. Our results show that intrinsic SiOx switching can be achieved with defects created solely by argon bombardment; in contrast to defects generated during deposition, implantation generated defects are potentially more controllable. In the future, noble ion implantation into silicon oxide may allow optimization of already excellent resistance switching devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207