Hypothalamic connectivities predict individual differences in ADT-elicited changes in working memory and quality of life in prostate cancer patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been associated with adverse effects on cognition. However, we currently lack understanding of the neurobiology and prognostic markers of these effects. Given that ADT acts via the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis, we assessed whether baseline hypothalamic resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) could predict changes in working memory and quality of life in prostate cancer patients following androgen deprivation. In a prospective observational study, 28 men with non-metastatic prostate cancer receiving ADT and 38 patients not receiving ADT (controls), matched in age, years of education and Montreal Cognitive Assessment score, participated in brain imaging at baseline, and N-back task and quality-of-life (QoL) assessments at baseline and at 6 months follow-up. Imaging data were processed with published routines and evaluated at a corrected threshold. ADT and control groups did not differ in N-back performance or QoL across time points. In ADT, the changes in 0-back correct response rate (follow-up-baseline) were correlated with baseline hypothalamus-precentral gyrus rsFC; the changes in 1-back correct response rate and reaction time were each correlated with hypothalamus-middle frontal gyrus and superior parietal lobule rsFC. The changes in physical well-being subscore of QoL were correlated with baseline hypothalamus-anterior cingulate and cuneus rsFC. The hypothalamus rsFCs predicted N-back and QoL change with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.93 and 0.73, respectively. Baseline hypothalamus-frontoparietal and salience network rsFC's predict inter-subject variations in the changes in working-memory and QoL following 6 months of ADT. Whether and how hypothalamic rsFCs may predict the cognitive and QoL effects with longer-term ADT remain to be investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".