Sex differences in central and peripheral fatigue induced by sustained isometric ankle plantar flexion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main aim of this study was to determine sex differences in central and peripheral fatigue produced by a sustained isometric exercise of ankle plantar flexors in healthy young adults. Ten males and fourteen females performed a sustained isometric ankle exercise until task failure. Maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) torque (plantarflexion), voluntary activation level (using the twitch interpolation technique), and resting twitch contractile properties [twitch peak torque (ST), twitch half relaxation time, and low frequency fatigue (LFF) ratio] were measured before, immediately after, and throughout a recovery period (1, 2, 5, and 10 min) following the exercise protocol in order to characterize neuromuscular fatigue. Fatigue had effects (p≤ 0.05) on all dependent variables (reduction in MVIC, VA and twitch torque and slowing of relaxation time). However, no significant differences in performance fatigability markers (MVIC torque decline and time to fatigue) and only minor differences in the variables reflecting central and peripheral fatigue mechanisms were found between males and females. A regression analysis did suggest a somewhat greater role of central fatigue in males compared with females. Females also showed a slightly greater and more prolonged decline in ST and LFF after exercise compared with males. The presence of only minor differences in central and peripheral fatigue mechanisms between males and females in the present study could be explained by the lack of important sex differences in performance fatigability, which could be due to lesser sex differences in the relative area of type I muscle fibers and in contractile function (muscle strength) of ankle plantar flexors as compared with other muscle groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".