MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281901111 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac079.198

GCT-04. Pattern of Treatment Failures in Central Nervous System Non-Germinomatous Germ Cell Tumors (CNS-NGGCT): A Pooled Analysis of Clinical Trials

2022· article· en· W4281901111 on OpenAlexaff
Adriana Fonseca, Cécile Faure‐Conter, Matthew J. Murray, Jason Fangusaro, Shivani Bailey, Stewart Goldman, Soumen Khatua, Didier Frapaz, Gabriele Calaminus, Girish Dhall, J. W. Nicholson, Éric Bouffet, Ute Bartels

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiation therapyInternal medicineCohortCogCentral nervous systemGerm cell tumorsClinical trialOncologyDiseaseChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: Central Nervous System- Non-Germinomatous Germ Cell Tumors (CNS-NGGCT) are rare but curable tumors. Due to their rarity, treatment failures remain a poorly characterized disease with unfavorable outcomes. In this study, we sought to characterize the treatment failures in a large cohort of prospectively treated patients. METHODS: European and North American clinical trials for patients with CNS-NGGCT (SIOP-GCT96, SFOP-TGM TC 90/92, COG-ACNS0122 and COG-ACNS1123) were pooled for analysis. Additionally, patients included and treated in the UK and France national registries under strict protocol-guidelines were included as an independent, non-overlapping cohort. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients experienced a treatment failure. Twenty-four patients had progressive disease during therapy and additional eleven patients were diagnosed with growing teratoma syndrome (GTS). Patients with GTS are significantly younger and present with local failures and negative tumor markers. Eighty-three individuals experienced disease relapses after treatment ended. Patients’ metastatic relapses presented significantly earlier than local relapses and were associated with tumor marker elevation (OR: 4.39; p=0.026). In our analysis, focal or whole ventricular (WVI) radiation therapy was not associated with an increased risk of metastatic relapses. CONCLUSIONS: Herein, we present the largest pooled dataset of prospectively treated patients with relapsed CNS-NGGCT. Our study identified younger age and negative tumor markers to be characteristic of GTS. Additionally, we elucidated that metastatic relapses occur earlier than local relapses, are associated with elevated tumor markers, and are not associated with the field of radiation therapy. These findings are of utmost importance for the planning of future clinical trials and the implementation of surveillance strategies in these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.011
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207