IMMU-13. Dual CTLA4/ PD-1 blockade improves survival for replication-repair deficient high-grade gliomas failing single agent PD-1 inhibition: An IRRDC study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND: High-grade gliomas (HGG) with replication-repair deficiency (RRD) harbour high mutation burden (TMB) and are rapidly fatal following chemo-radiation approaches. Although hypermutation results in objective responses and prolonged survival in >30% of patients undergoing PD1-blockade, salvage following failure of PD1-inhibition remains a challenge. METHODS: We performed a real-world study of Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4) in combination with Nivolumab/Pembrolizumab for patients failing single-agent PD1-inhibition. RESULTS: Among 68 consortium patients with relapsed HGG treated with single-agent PD1-inhibitors, progression was observed in 43 (63%). Ipilimumab was added to 20/43 (46.5%), 14 (32.5%) received best supportive care (BSC), and 9 (21%) received miscellaneous therapies. For patients receiving CTLA4/PD1-inhibition, median age at progression was 12.3-years (IQR: 9; 15.6). Time from anti-PD1 initiation to progression was 8-months (IQR: 3.8; 18.5). Germline predisposition was observed in all patients (CMMRD: 70%, Lynch: 25%, polymerase-proofreading deficiency: 5%). All HGG were hypermutant (median TMB: 182 mutations/Mb; IQR: 15.6; 369.4). Centralized radiology review revealed objective responses in 3/20 (15%, all ultra-hypermutant: 320, 496, 834 mutations/Mb), stable disease in 5 (25%), and 12 (60%) eventually progressed (iRANO). Following failure of PD1-blockade, estimated progression-free and overall survival at 18-months for patients receiving CTLA4/PD1-inhibition were 11% and 25%, respectively. Importantly, survival was superior to patients receiving BSC (median OS <1-month versus 12-months on CTLA4/PD1-inhibition; p<0.001). All patients receiving BSC died within 3.5-months, while 4/8 survivors were alive for >1-year on the anti-CTLA4/PD1combination (range:1-48 months). The combinational immunotherapy resulted in significant autoimmune toxicity in 11/20 (55%), warranting immunosuppressive therapy in all, and treatment abandonment in 6 patients. CONCLUSION: Combined CTLA4/PD1-blockade after failure of single-agent PD1-inhibition revealed objective responses and prolonged survival in an otherwise rapidly-fatal disease. This needs to be assessed in the context of significant autoimmunity, supporting the need for the current prospective trial (NCT04500548), and novel strategies to limit treatment-related toxicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".