MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281930770 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsac079.637

0640 North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy Consortium: Baseline characteristics in 251 patients with REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

2022· article· en· W4281930770 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan E. Elliott, Miranda M. Lim, Allison Keil, Alon Y. Avidan, Don Bliwise, Jean‐François Gagnon, Michael J. Howell, Daniel E. Huddleston, Jennifer McLeland, Ronald B. Postuma, Erik K. St. Louis, Aleksandar Videnović, Bradley F. Boeve, Yo‐El S. Ju

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsREM sleep behavior disorderDementiaDementia with Lewy bodiesSynucleinopathiesMedicinePolysomnographyDiseaseFamily historyPsychiatryPediatricsPsychologyInternal medicineParkinson's diseaseAlpha-synucleinElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Introduction: Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD) is characterized by a lack of muscle atonia during REM sleep with dream enactment. RBD is regarded as a prodromal synucleinopathy as a high proportion of patients eventually phenoconvert to Parkinson’s Disease and related synucleinopathies, suggesting RBD may be an early non-motor symptom of disease. Accordingly, patients with RBD are ideally situated to test potential therapeutic interventions to prevent phenoconversion to synucleinopathy. However, RBD itself, and associated patient registries, are rare. The North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy Consortium (NAPS) establishes a multisite registry of RBD patients with standardized neurological, neuropsychiatric, and neuropsychological assessments and biomarker collection. The present work reports baseline characteristics of this RBD patient database at its current state. Methods Methods: Participants >18 years of age with overnight polysomnogram-confirmed RBD by ICSD-3 criteria who did not meet criteria for the diagnosis of PD, dementia, MSA, or narcolepsy were enrolled from 10 sites across North America (8/2018 to 4/2021). Data collection included family and personal history of RBD and related symptoms, as well as standardized assessments related to cognitive, motor, sensory and autonomic function. Additionally, all subjects have contributed blood, and a subset of subjects have contributed cerebrospinal fluid samples to the National Centralized Repository for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias for future analysis. Results Results: A total of n=251 participants were enrolled. Outcomes are reported based on sex (n=202 male, n=49 female). Data were further examined based on participants’ history of antidepressant use (n=142 with, n=103 without) and based on participants’ extent of synucleinopathy burden (n=70 defined as isolated RBD, n=181 defined as RBD+ [i.e., exhibiting ≥1 abnormality]). Any observed sex differences among the data did not persist after correction for antidepressant use. Conclusion Conclusions: This prospective, cross-sectional data on history, demographic, cognitive, motor, sensory, and autonomic function in n=251 participants with RBD highlight the lack of sex differences and the high preponderance of concomitant neurological abnormalities with RBD, and provide a valuable registry for future longitudinal studies and neuroprotective clinical trials. Support (If Any) NIH NIA R34 AG056639 (YJ, BB)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207